The 2026 AI strategy provides a real foundation
DINUM, DITP and DGAFP published a common AI-use guide in June 2026, while the State is deploying shared AI infrastructure and negotiating a public-service framework. The Plan’s 400,000 figure remains its own training target and should not be presented as an official needs estimate.
A four-level skills model is more useful than a single course: basic literacy, job-specific use, AI project/reference capability and specialist design/audit skills. Certification can be broad at the first levels while degree-level routes are reserved for deeper roles.
Training must connect to real use cases and measured outcomes
Mentor already offers AI learning content. Each job pathway should include practical exercises, sensitive-data rules, human oversight and evaluation of hallucinations and source verification. High-impact domains such as justice, health, HR and enforcement need reinforced safeguards.
The investment should report certified skills, observed productivity and cash savings separately. Time freed and reinvested in better service is valuable, but it must not be counted again as a headcount saving under other measures.
Costing and legal delivery
Programme legislation and training budget, interministerial competency framework, university partnerships and certified learning paths.
Investment. Benefits count only after use cases, time saved and tool/inference costs are measured.
Transition expenditure is reported separately from recurring savings, and transferred activity remains public expenditure unless the policy itself is discontinued.
What must be proved before implementation
Training 400,000 people without targeting can produce certificates without changing work; training must connect to real use cases.
The implementation file should link every training pathway to authorised AI tools, job capabilities, safeguards and a measurable use case. It must report capability after training, real adoption after six months and operational outcomes rather than attendance alone.
Notes and sources
- DINUM — Guide d’usage de l’IA pour les agents de l’État — primary/institutional source used for the measure framework.
- IA dans l’État — stratégie et socle interministériel — primary/institutional source used for the measure framework.
- DGAFP — négociation de l’accord-cadre IA, juin 2026 — primary/institutional source used for the measure framework.
- DGAFP — Accompagner et former les agents publics à l’IA — primary/institutional source used for the measure framework.
- Mentor — formations IA et données — primary/institutional source used for the measure framework.

